pdme/tests/util/test_fast_nonlocal_spectrum.py
Deepak Mallubhotla 5fbff2a5c0
All checks were successful
gitea-physics/pdme/pipeline/head This commit looks good
feat: adds fast nonlocal noise Sij calculator
2022-03-27 15:57:17 -05:00

48 lines
1.5 KiB
Python

import numpy
import pdme.util.fast_nonlocal_spectrum
import logging
import pytest
def test_fast_nonlocal_calc():
d1 = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
d2 = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8]
d3 = [2, 5, 3, 4, -5, -6, 2]
d4 = [-3, 2, 1, 4, 5, 6, 10]
dipoles = numpy.array([d1, d2, d3, d4])
dot_pairs = numpy.array([
[[-1, -2, -3, 11], [-1, 2, 5, 11]],
[[-1, -2, -3, 6], [2, 4, 6, 6]]
])
# expected_ij is for pair i, dipole j
expected_11 = 0.000021124454334947546213
expected_12 = 0.000022184755131682365135
expected_13 = 0.0000053860643617855849275
expected_14 = -0.0000023069501696755220764
expected_21 = 0.00022356021100884617796
expected_22 = 0.00021717277640859343002
expected_23 = 0.000017558321044891869169
expected_24 = -0.000034714318479634499683
expected = numpy.array([[expected_11, expected_21], [expected_12, expected_22], [expected_13, expected_23], [expected_14, expected_24]])
# this is a bit silly but just set the logger to debug so that the coverage stats don't get affected by the debug statements.
pdme.util.fast_nonlocal_spectrum._logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)
numpy.testing.assert_allclose(pdme.util.fast_nonlocal_spectrum.fast_s_nonlocal(dot_pairs, dipoles), expected, err_msg="nonlocal voltages at dot aren't as expected.")
def test_fast_nonlocal_frequency_check():
d1 = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
dipoles = numpy.array([d1])
dot_pairs = numpy.array([
[[-1, -2, -3, 11], [-1, 2, 5, 10]]
])
with pytest.raises(ValueError):
pdme.util.fast_nonlocal_spectrum.fast_s_nonlocal(dot_pairs, dipoles)