pyewjn/tests/noise/test_chi_nam.py
Deepak Mallubhotla 2b22267f36
All checks were successful
gitea-physics/pyewjn/pipeline/head This commit looks good
fix: fixes stuff with nam integration
2022-03-28 21:16:26 -05:00

59 lines
1.3 KiB
Python

import numpy as np
import pytest
import pyewjn.dielectric
import pyewjn.noise.chi
from pyewjn.baskets import CalculationParams
cutoff_to_use = 5.4596e9
@pytest.fixture
def chi_zz_e_nam():
params = CalculationParams(
omega=1e9, v_f=2e6, omega_p=3.544907701811032e15, tau=1e-14, t_rel=0.99999
)
eps_l = pyewjn.dielectric.get_nam_dielectric(cutoff_to_use, params)
return pyewjn.noise.chi.get_chi_zz_e(eps_l)
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
"test_input,expected",
[
# z chi_zz_e_nam(z)
(1e-5, 4.07695673649665e6),
(1e-6, 4.095895777068543e9),
# (1e-7, 5.012885033150058e12), commenting this one out because it seems numerically too unstable
# (1e-8, 1.441261982619894e16), commenting this one out because it seems numerically too unstable
],
)
def test_chi_zz_e_nam(chi_zz_e_nam, test_input, expected):
actual = chi_zz_e_nam(test_input)
np.testing.assert_allclose(
actual,
expected,
rtol=0.05,
err_msg="chi_zz_e is inaccurate for nam case",
verbose=True,
)
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
"test_input,expected",
[
# z chi_zz_e_nam(z)
(1e-6, 4.095895777068543e9),
],
)
def test_chi_zz_e_nam_benchmark(benchmark, chi_zz_e_nam, test_input, expected):
actual = benchmark(chi_zz_e_nam, test_input)
np.testing.assert_allclose(
actual,
expected,
rtol=0.05,
err_msg="chi_zz_e is inaccurate for nam case",
verbose=True,
)